Wrought iron corn rick stands or stools: a specialism of Thomas Gibson & Son, Edinburgh 

One of the big names in wrought iron stack stools until the outbreak the First World War was Thomas Gibson & Son, Edinburgh.  The 14409407_522563334603638_7435688561474957941_ocompany started as Gibson & Tait, at Bainfield, Fountainbridge, Edinburgh. It was already trading in 1868.  The partnership of J. Charles Tait and Thomas Gibson was dissolved by mutual consent by the partners on 1873.  After that date the business was carried on by Mr Gibson. 

By 1869 Thomas also set up a new company with his son, Thomas, as Thomas Gibson & Son.  It was located at Gibson Terrace, Bainfield, Fountainbridge.  In 1869 it described itself as “iron and wire fence, iron gate, and wire netting manufacturers, wire workers, smiths, engineers and agricultural implement makers”.

14424930_522563204603651_1627545961317082553_oFrom 1874 to 1914 the company was a regular exhibitor at the Highland Show, also exhibiting in all the show districts throughout Scotland.  It was also an award-winner at that show for its wrought iron field gates, its iron hurdles suited for sheep pens as well as for its general collection of agricultural implements.  Its manufactures included entrance gates, field gates, continuous fences, tree guards, galvanised wire netting, horse rakes, fodder racks, pheasant feeders, poultry feeders, wheel barrows, sack barrows, wire chairs, garden seats, flower tables, and potato baskets.
By 1875 the company was making its wrought iron corn rick stands. These were a framework of iron spars which interlocked together in an octagonal shape which had a stool at each corner and one in the 14324122_522563344603637_3403764012225385670_ocentre.  The stools were designed to ensure that rats did not climb up them: they were mushroom shaped with an overhang which was to be difficult for rats to climb over.  They were made in a number of sizes (as were those from other makers).  It continued to make a selection of them until 1919.

If you see wrought iron rick stands you will usually see the maker’s name on the top of each stool.  Other makers included Thomas Pearson & Co., Queen Street, Glasgow, one of the largest makers in the world.

The photographs of the Gibson corn rick stand were taken at the Highland Folk Museum, Newtonmore.  The display at the Strathnairn Farmers Association Working Vintage Rally & Display, September 2014, shows a stack built on a wrought iron rick stand.

© 2016 Heather Holmes

Share

Digging tatties the old-fashioned way

While we may think of the tattie spinner as an “old” machine, it was patented by J. Hanson in 1855.  Before that year, and also well-into the twentieth century, a much older implement was used to harvest the potato crop: the potato plough.

Henry Stephens described the use of the potato plough in his The Book of the Farm in 1844.  He writes:

14361342_522816751244963_8038139084027563445_o“In employing the plough to take up potatoes, the common one, with 2 horses, answers well; but as the potatoes run the hazard of being split by the coulter when it comes in contact with them, it should be taken out, the sock being sufficient to enter the plough below the drill, and the mould-board to turn them out of it.  The plough in going up splits one drill, and in returning splits the next, but no faster than a band of gatherers, of field-workers, if numerous enough, but if not, assisted by hired labourers, can clear the ground of them into the baskets.  In free soil potatoes are easily seen and picked up; heavier soil is apt to adhere to them, in which case it is a good plan to make a stout field-worker shake those portions of the earth turned up by the plough, which still adhere in lumps, with a potato grain, and expose the tubers.”

Given the labour-intensive nature of the plough, developments were made to improve it for harvesting potatoes.  By 1844 John Lawson of Elgin had developed a mouldboard shaped device of six malleable iron bars which were attached to the right side of the head and stilt of the plough.  For Stephens, this had a number of advantages: “The mode of operation of the brander is, that while the earth partly passes through it, and is partly placed aside by it, the potatoes are wholly laid aside, so there are few of them but are left exposed on the surface of the ground.”

14425531_522816777911627_5494737640532523739_oLawson’s potato plough or brander was drawn by a pair of horses: “in working it, the ploughman inserts it into the potato drill so as to have the whole of the potatoes on his right-hand side.  He then proceeds along the drill, splitting it up in the common way.  The earth is this thrown to the right-hand side, and the potatoes lie scattered on the surface of the ground behind the plough.  Women follow, provided with baskets, into which they gather the potatoes, and throw the stems upon the drill which lies to the right hand side of one from which they are gathering the potatoes. … A man with 1 pair of horses will thus pass over the ground as quickly as with the common plough.  In light soils this plough performs its work in a very efficient manner.  It pulverises the soil in an extraordinary degree, and scarcely leaves a single potato in the soil.”

In 1889 the potato plough was used to harvest the tattie crop in certain sitiuations.  Henry Stephens notes:
“On farms where the potato-digger has not been introduced, or on fields very steep and otherwise unsuitable for the digger, the aid of a plough of one kind or other is usually invoked in lifting potatoes.  In some cases the double mould-board plough is used; in others, it is the ordinary single furrow swing-plough; in others, the American chill plough; while not a few employ specially fitted “potato-ploughs”.

He adds that: “The “potato plough” may be an entirely distinct implement, or an ordinary plough fitted with a potato-raiser-a series of iron or steel fingers running out from one or both sides of the body of the plough.
The specially fitted ploughs are certainly superior to the ordinary ploughs for lifting potatoes, yet it is generally agreed that if a separate implement is to be procured for this work, that implement should be the potato-digger proper.”

Potato ploughs continued to be used well into the twentieth century.  By that time they tended to be used for specialist tasks, such as harvesting first earlies which required to be gently handled. But they still remained one of the ways in which potatoes were harvested in Scotland.  The others were the spinner digger, the elevator digger, and the mechanical harvester which was starting to be developed to alleviate the problems of securing sufficient labour to harvest the potato crop.

The photographs of the potato ploughs were taken at the Fife Vintage Agricultural Machinery Club Farming Heritage Show and Annual Rally, June 2016 and at the Highland Folk Museum, Newtonmore, May 2015.

 

© 2016 Heather Holmes

Share

Forks 

14258131_520808968112408_24585111696614537_oForks were an important hand tool to have around the farm.  There were various types of forks, each used to undertake specific tasks including hay-making, grain harvesting, threshing and feeding cattle.  These former activities included a lot of forking!

Henry Stephens describes in detail harvest forks and their uses in The Book of the Farm in 1889.  He states:

“Forks used in the loading of corn require to have long shafts, not less than 6 feet, and small prongs.  Such a length of shaft is required 14289882_520809054779066_4714534728523906597_oto lift the sheaf from the ground to the top of a loaded cart, or from the cart to the top of a stack.  The fork used in the field should have a strong stiff shaft, as the load on the cart is at no great elevation.  That for unloading the cart to the stack should be slender and elastic, as many of the sheaves have to be thrown a considerable height above the head.
The prongs, being small (about half the length of the prongs of the hay-fork), just retain hold of the sheaf, without being so deeply pierced into the band as to be withdrawn from it with difficulty.  A deep and firm hold with long prongs renders the pitching of a sheaf a difficult matter; and if one of the prongs happen to be bent, or a little turned up at the point, the difficulty is much increased. 14352518_520808918112413_8494698910167466694_o
The prongs of the forks are now made of steel, and are therefore much lighter, more durable, and far superior in every way to the old-fashioned iron fork.
The best fork for the person on the top of the stack to use, in assisting the builder, is the short stable-fork.”

Forks could be purchased from agricultural ironmongers or general implement and machine makers.  Makers included Spear and Jackson, Sheffield, probably the most well-known maker.

The photographs show forks being used in haymaking and threshing at the Fife Vintage Rally in June 2014 and 2015.

© 2016 Heather Holmes

Share

The grain handling revolution

14379879_522843987908906_32481634458283199_oThe introduction of combine harvesters brought a revolution in the way that grain was handled on the farm.  It also brought with it a revolution in the implements, machines and sundries available to handle grain.  These included grain driers and grain storage plants and installations, as well as grain-pick ups to move grain.

14324504_522844087908896_4227859843101999869_oMost of them were made by companies in England, though D. M. Wallace & Sons Ltd, Kelso, was making bin hopper bottoms by 1952.  Early makers included Geo. W. King Ltd, Hitching, Herts, Matthews & yates Ltd, Swinton, Manchester, Mitchell, Colman & Co. Ltd, London, and E. R. & F. Turner Ltd, Ipswich.

14379770_522845854575386_3267118646922618840_oBy 1966 Coleman grain dryers, elevators, conveyors and stores were being widely advertised in Scotland.  Mitchell, Colman & Co. Ltd, London, had a wide network of agents and stockists. These included: Alexanders of Edinburgh Ltd, Edinburgh Elgin Central Engineers Ltd, Elgin Jack Olding & Co. (Scotland) Limited, Perth Stirling Tractors Ltd, St 14425425_522845697908735_970810476525791658_oNinians, Stirling Barclay, Ross & Hutchison Ltd, Aberdeen Frew & Company Ltd, Perth Stanley Partridge, Ardlaw, Fraserburgh J. & G. Sutherland, Halkirk, Caithness A. & J. Bowen & Co. Ltd, Markinch and Cairneyhill Gillies & Henderson Ltd, Edinburgh Rickerby Ltd, Annan and Dumfries William Elder & Sons Ltd, Berwick On Tweed James Gordon (Engineers) Ltd, Castle Douglas Neil Ross (Tractors) Ltd, Forfar.

This revolution also brought changes to the way that farm buildings were used, and on some farms new buildings were erected; on others buildings were modified to accommodate the new plant. Storage was also required for the plant to be kept during the rest of the year.

14324630_522845807908724_6689742179141713434_oIt isn’t often that you see aspects of the grain handling revolution around the vintage rallies.  It is an aspect of the revolution in Scottish farming that is much neglected and whose history is not well-recorded.

The photographs show grain drying, Pilmuir Farm, Balerno, Midlothian, mid 1980s and exhibits at the Fife Vintage Agricultural Machinery Club Farming Heritage Show and Annual Rally, June 2015.

© 2016 Heather Holmes

Share

Buying a binder in Scotland in the early 1960s 

14379883_521035664756405_8334632658564678900_oWhile combine harvesters had gained a firm footing in Scotland by the early 1960s, binders continued to be made and used.

By 1963 the only British makers of combines were two Scottish companies: J. Bisset & Sons Ltd, Blairgowrie, and John Wallace & Sons Ltd. Both were long established makers, also being world-renowned for them.

J. Bisset & Sons Ltd, manufactured a semi-mounted binder, powered from the tractor p-t-o, with a left hand 5 ft or 6 ft cut. John Wallace had the “J.F” front-mounted or trailer model binders of 5 ft or 6 ft cut.

14311446_521027111423927_5912469563646344605_oBisset continued to sell binders until mid 1966. On 16 June that year, the company passed an extraordinary resolution to voluntarily wind up the company; it was dissolved in 20 November 1970.

14258268_521036931422945_187697752966065019_oThe last Bisset binders to be made were acquired by A. & C. MacLennan, The Garage, Spittalfield, Perthshire. On 22 July 1967 the garage advertised in the Scottish farmer, “last Bisset binders to be manufactured semi-mounted 6ft cut £195”. The garage brought to an end the long tradition of Bisset binders, and the long association with Perthshire and binder-making.

The photographs of the Bisset binder (tractor mounted) were taken at B. A. Stores, May 2014, and Scotland’s Farming Yesteryear, September, 2014 (trailing model).

© 2016 Heather Holmes

Share

Buying a combine harvester in Scotland in the early 1960s 

If you were looking to buy a combine in the early 1960s you could 14352625_521004928092812_1173264729087252610_ohave chosen one from a number of makers.  They included Allis Chalmers Great Britain Ltd, Bamfords Ltd, David Brown Tractors (Sales) Ltd, J. I. Case, Coleman & Co. (Agricultural) Ltd, Fahr Products Ltd, International Harvester Co. of Great Britain Ltd, J. Mann & Son Ltd, Massey Ferguson (UK) Ltd, Ransomes Sims & Jefferies Ltd, and Viking Farm Machinery Ltd. 

14310564_521004778092827_5590454172043689356_oBy 1960 a number of Scottish implement and machine makers had agencies with these makers to sell their combines.

If you wanted a Massey Ferguson 780 self-propelled combine, you could purchase one from John Wallace & Sons (Ayr) Ltd, Ayr or Jack Olding & Co. (Scotland) Ltd, Coupar Angus. Gillies & Henderson Ltd, Edinburgh, and A. M. Russell 14289881_521018684758103_4331114117304684831_oLtd, Edinburgh, were selling Bamford Claeys combines.  They included a self-propelled one fitted with a diesel engine and the “Super 500” with a p-t-o drive. In Aberdeen, R. G. Garvie & Sons was agent for “Claas”. These agents all exhibited their combines at the Highland Show in 1960.

The photographs of the Bamford Claeys combine were taken at the Fife Vintage Agricultural Machinery Rally, June 2014.  The photographs of the Ransomes combine were taken in Newark show ground, June 2014.

© 2016 Heather Holmes

Share

The latest in binders 

The 1880s and 1890s saw important developments in machinery to harvest the grain crop.  Binders entered the Scottish harvest field.

13937892_506486346211337_7023720864970608410_oScottish agents started to exhibit them at the Highland Show from 1882 onwards.  By 1899 there were 11 Scottish machines being exhibited, though by all one maker, J. Bisset & Sons, Blairgowrie.  Bisset exhibited its first binder at that show in 1887 and continued to market it as the only binder ‘entirely manufactured in Scotland’.

There were a good number of English makers of binders.  They exhibited them in increasing numbers in the mid 1880s and 1890s, though the number of machines that the exhibited fell sharply after 1900.

img_2148The majority of binders were from America and Canada.  Exhibitors and makers from these countries played an increasing role in the Highland Show from 1884.  From the mid-1890s they came to dominate the exhibition of binders.  As Henry Stephens notes in 1908 ‘the manufacture of combined reapers and binders is now carried on extensively by many eminent firms – Canadian and American machines competing strongly against British-made ones in our own country’.

The Highland and Agricultural Society of Scotland was keen to promote the adoption and use of binders in Scotland.  During the mid 1890s it held a series of annual exhibition of binders at work, in conjunction with the Highland Show.

img_1678At the exhibition ay Mr Morton’s farm of Muirton, Perth, in August 1896 farmers and other agriculturists could see ten machines at work.  They were from a range of makers.  From Scotland, J. Bisset & Sons, Blairgowrie, exhibited its new patent open back steel-built binder, costing £44.  Two other Scottish exhibitors acted as agents for major North American companies.  James Gray & Co., Stirling, was agent for Adriance, Platt & Co., New York, and exhibited its rear discharge binder, costing £35.  John Wallace & Sons, Glasgow, had the Canadian Massey-Harris open end elevating canvas binder made by Massey-Harris Co. Ltd, Brantford, Ontario.

There were four English makers.  Three exhibited their own machines, also being major names on the harvest field: Harrison, McGregor & Co. Ltd, Leigh, Richard Hornsby & Sons Ltd, Grantham, Samuelson & Co. Ltd, Banbury.  Another acted as an agent: Blackstone & Co. Ltd, Stamford, renowned for its hay-making machinery, had the ‘Bonnie binder’ made by The Johnstone Harvester Co., New York.  Walter A. Wood M. & R. M. Co., with a London address, but a North American company, had its open rear harvester and binder, with transport attachment.

13913769_506486409544664_4297296596392674355_oI wonder what farmers and agriculturists thought of the spectacle of seeing these new machines as they watched them hard at work at the Highland Society’s exhibition.

The selection of photographs of binders was taken at Scotland’s Farming Yesteryear, September 2014, and at Fife Agricultural Machinery rally, June 2015.

© 2016 Heather Holmes

Share

The changing face of bringing home the harvest

Leading the harvest changed greatly during the course of the 14352241_520820384777933_6196311849718372566_otwentieth century.  With the reaper, sheaves were brought home on harvest carts as well as ordinary carts.  Harvest frames could be put on flat trailers to allow sheaves to be built on them.

14305194_520818918111413_1797491921664356427_oWith the use of the combine harvester, grain handling systems were radically altered.  Threshed grain was taken home from the field.  Depending on the model, early combines could deliver the grain into bags, and bagged grain taken to the steading or to the mill.  Grain tanks could allow the grain to be delivered into trailers.  Ultimately, trailers made for the easiest and most efficient way to handle grain coming off the combine. 

14372054_520818978111407_2770079679729386411_oTrailers for grain and other general purposes were made by a large number of makers in Scotland, with the north-east having a number of prominent makers, especially from the 1950s onwards.

In 1952 general trailers were made by implement and machine makers including: Aberdeen Precision Engineering Co. Ltd, Aberdeen, George Brown, Pluscardin, Elgin, Cobban of Inverurie, Inverurie, Dechmont Welding & Engineering Co. Ltd, Salton, Cambuslang, Wm Dickie & Sons Ltd, East Kilbride, E. T. Y. Gray, Fetterangus, Thomas Hay & Sons, Portsoy, Alex Jack & Sons Ltd, Maybole, Alex Laurie & Sons, Falkirk, O. G. Mainland, Shapinsay, Kirkwall, Thomas McKellar & Sons, High Fenwick, James McKirdle, Caerlaverock, Dumfries, David Ritchie, Whitehills, Forfar, John Rutherford & Sons Ltd, Coldstream, Ryeside Agricultural & Engineering Works, Dalry, Alexander Scott (Agricultural Engineers) Ltd, Stirling, Scottish Farm Implements Ltd, Crosshouse, Kilmarnock, Jas. Simpson & Son (Peterhead) Ltd, Peterhead, Alexander Thomas, Guildtown, Perthshire, and John Wallace & Sons (Ayr) Ltd, Ayr.

14305406_520821628111142_3416534257179212158_oThe way the grain was cut and the amount of crop to be handled shaped the grain handling systems used.  These systems were important in mechanising the grain harvest and making sure that the crop was brought home safely and as quickly and efficiently as possible.

14372308_520819958111309_117245388798743576_oI wonder what a farmer in 1900 would have thought of the bringing home of harvest at the end of the twentieth century!

The photographs were taken at the Fife Vintage Agricultural Machinery Club Rally, 2015, the Strathnairn rally, 2014, Scotland’s Farming Yesteryear, September 2014, and at Pilmuir Farm, Balerno, 1990s.

Share

Leading the harvest

Leading the harvest, or bringing in the stooks to the stackyard to be
stacked, was one of the major tasks in the farming year.  It was a 14311491_520732324786739_3345413658036732848_olabour-intensive task, requiring all the farm-staff, sometimes working for long hours.  In wet or protracted seasons, leading could take place over a number of weeks.  In particularly poor seasons work continued until Christmas or New Year.

Leading took place at different rates, even within a district.  For example, in Aberdeenshire in September 1884, the Aberdeen journal noted that:

“The weather on Tuesday was cool and breezy, and a deal of grain was led in very good order.  On Wednesday, with the exception of a passing shower or two, which were heavy enough in some places to stop leading, it was also fine, and yesterday was an exceptionally busy day on the harvest field, the weather being everything that could be desired.  Even in sheltered nooks the stuff was sufficiently well dried to allow its being carted home, and near the city leading was proceeding vigorously, but where the ends of the sheaves are full of clover and grass the west side of the stocks are still too wet for leading.  The harvest is all but finished on the north-east seaboard of Aberdeenshire for some twelve miles inland. Leading would be nearly finished this week all over the county, with the exception of the glen districts, if the present weather continues.  On Deeside there is a remainder still to cut, and a good many fields are covered with stooks.  It will be a week hence, probably more, before the harvest is finished about Braemar.  The harvest is now fairly completed in the Turriff district.  Owing to the mild, foggy weather which prevailed during the early part of the month some difficulty was experienced in getting the grain to keep in the stackyard, but the sharp, drying breezes of the past week have helped greatly to cool the heated stacks and put the stocks still afield in splendid condition for leading.”

14324698_520738618119443_6812799716366805748_oLeading involved a lot of forking.  It also involved a lot of careful planning to ensure that the teams with the carts or trailers were efficiently loaded and unloaded.  Ideally, there was one or more cart or trailer being loaded in the field at the same time when there was one or more being unloaded at the stackyard.  When teams were too fast or too slow and work was not steady tempers were tried.  There could be “aye another load coming” or workers were standing in the yard.

Carts were loaded with sheaves in a particular way. According to Henry Stephens, writing in The Book of the Farm, in 1889:

“A corn-cart is loaded with sheaves in this way:  The body is first filled with sheaves, their butt-ends to the shaft-horse, and to the back-end of the cart.  When these come to the level of the frame, other sheaves are placed across them in a row along both sides and both ends of the frame, with the butt-ends projecting as far beyond the outer rail as the band, the sheaf at each corner of the frame being held in its place by transfixion upon a spike of the elongated bolt which secures the corner of the outer-rail frame.  Another row of sheaves is placed upon these.  Sheaves are then placed along the middle of the cart with the butt-ends like those in the body upon the corn-ends of the side sheaves to fill up the hollow of the load.
Thus row after row of sheaves is placed, and the hollow in the middle filled well up at last, 12 full stooks making a good load upon an ordinary cart.
Before finishing, it should be seen that the load is neither too light nor too heavy upon the horse’s back.
A load thus built will have all the butt-ends of the sheaves on the outside, and the corn-ends in the inside.”

“Leading” is a word that brings back many memories of the grain harvest.  Ask anyone who worked with at the harvest in the days of the binders and they will tell you about the hard work, skill and frustrations of the work.  But they will also tell you about the pride in undertaking the work: you could tell the status of a farm by the state of the stackyard and the way the stacks had been built.

The photographs of loading the harvest cart were taken at Scotland’s Farming Yesteryear, September 2014.

Share

Making the change from binder to combine in the early 1950s 

14242357_520631318130173_8227380550065425035_oIn the early 1950s farmers and agriculturists in Scotland had a choice in the harvesting system they used to cut their grain crops.  Over much of the country the grain harvest continued to be cut with the binder which had come into Scotland in the 1880s and 1890s and improved.  The second and newer system, was the combine harvester, first used by some of the larger and more progressive farmers and agriculturists.

In 1952 binders continued to be made by four makers in Britain, one of which was Scottish, and world-renowned for their manufacture. J. Bisset & Sons Ltd, Greenback Works, Blairgowrie, Perthshire continued to make a selection of 5ft and 6ft cut machines.  They included tractor draught and an engine driven one with a left hand cut, as well as a hydraulically mounted, p-t-o driven one. 

14361467_520631474796824_9013389113570212896_oHarrison, McGregor & Guest Ltd, Albion Works, leigh, Lancashire, was another well-known maker of binders, and its “Albion” brand was well-known in the Scottish harvest field. It made a selection of horse and tractor drawn models, all of which had a left hand cut. They could have a 5ft, 6ft or 7ft cut.  The horse drawn binder was land wheel driven, and there was also a tractor pulled one which was also driven in this way.  The company also made a tractor p-t-o driven binder, available in a range of cuts.

The third maker was also well-known in the Scottish harvest field: International Harvester Company of Great Britain of 259 City Road, London. Unlike Harrison, McGregor & Guest Ltd, it only made tractor driven models. It specialised in machines with a 6ft or 7ft cut.

The fourth maker was H. Leverton & Co. Ltd, of Spalding, Lincolnshire. It sold the “Lanz” oil bath p-t-o-driven binder with 6ft, 7ft or 8ft cuts. It could have a left or right hand cut.

14324503_520631434796828_2624501275511767812_oBy comparison to the binders, the making and selling of combine harvesters was being undertaken on an increasing scale.  By 1952 there were at least 8 makers, all with addresses in England; a number were American or continental companies.  They included Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co., Associated Manufacturers’ Co. (London) Ltd (for “Case”), Bolinders Co. Ltd (for “Munktell”), J. Mann & Son Ltd (for “Class”), Marshall Sons & Co. Ltd (for “Grain-Marshall”), Massey Harris Ltd, Sale Tilney (Agricultural) Ltd (for “Minneapolis-Moline”), and M. B. Wild & Co. Ltd (for “Wild Harvest Thresher”).  Some were to continue to be important and renowned makers in the next decades and widely used across the Scottish harvest fields.

These companies sold combines which could be self-propelled or tractor drawn and had varying widths of cut (from 6ft to 12ft), means to hold the cut grain (bag or tank) and weight (from 2,975lb to 55 cwt).

The photographs of the binder and International Harvester combine were taken at the Strathnairn Working Vintage Rally & Display, September 2014. (combine and binder later than 1952).

Share