The First World War (1914-18) brought significant challenges to Scottish agriculture. The requisition of horses and man-power to work on farms posed significant issues in the face of the need to encourage home food production. While implement making businesses were involved in munitions work – thus diverting their usual work and activities – there was a push to try to introduce and adopt some labour-saving implements and machines.
At the start of the war there was a recognition that motor power could help with ploughing and assist with some other key tasks such as threshing. While there was generally little development in Britain, there had been much more in the United States.
Getting farmers and other agriculturists to start to adopt motor tractors – regardless of their form and whether or not they were available – was a challenge. To move from horse to motor power was a significant cultural and social change. It was one that had been experienced with the introduction of the steam ploughs from the mid nineteenth century onwards.
An important way to persuade them of the merits (and otherwise) of motor tractors was to hold working demonstrations. At first these were of ploughing; others included threshing, working with the binder. They allowed them to see these motors at work and their capabilities.
The first demonstration of motors for ploughing in Scotland was reported to have taken place at Bettyfield, between Kelso and St Boswells, in the Scottish Borders. It was organised by Newton St Boswells and District Farmers’ Club. It was widely reported in the Scottish press. Some accounts of it included reflective pieces on the current state of agriculture and ploughing and ploughing technologies. One such account appeared in The Scotsman on 18 February 1915. It is worth quoting at length for its insights and observations:
“Agriculture
Future of ploughing
The old idea and the new in Scotland
The advent of the motor
Agriculture, it is no exaggeration to say, has been revolutionised by the mechanical developments of the last half-century. Many an old order has changed, or given place to a new. The harvest field has lost much of its former charm, and the bulk of its population, owing to the advent of the self-binder; most implements of tillage have assumed new form, and both in the fields and on the steading-nowhere more so than in the Lothians to-day – the mechanical, labour-saving spirit is abroad. Contrary to his conservative reputation, the farmer has in recent times shown a disposition to give every fresh invention a fair trial, and a readiness to adopt it if the idea is practicable. Amidst the manifold changes that have taken place, however, the most ancient of all our agricultural implements, and the one dearest to the heart of the farming community, the plough has preserved to a remarkable degree the form which has come down through the centuries. It survived, and in this country little felt, the influence of the introduction of the steam plough, but its place to-day is being threatened by the new and stronger force which has in other fields of activity displaced the horse to so great an extent. The motor plough is the new feature in agriculture. Already in the Lothians, within a radius of twenty-five miles of Edinburgh, four motor ploughs have been introduced, all within the last few months. The direct cause of the introduction at least two of them is the shortage of men and horses which the country’s call and the impressment agents’ activities has brought about. But, of course, these reasons would not have been sufficient in themselves to account for the departure had the mechanical plough not been a practical proposition. Its practicability has been recognised by the governing bodies in agriculture, and important trials in both England and Scotland had been arranged; but owing to the war the Highland and Agricultural Society, it appears, deemed it advisable to postpone their event until happier times, when, to use an appropriate metaphor, the swords now clashing will have been beaten into ploughshares, and the ancient prophecy fulfilled. Then, too, the old wish of “Speed the plough!” will have taken on a new and literal significance in the light of modern tendencies, for whatever happened, whether or not the motor gains a strong footing in agriculture, it seems certain that the same time is not to be spent on ploughing in the future as in the past.
The call on the Borderland
The first public demonstration of motor ploughing in Scotland took place in the Borders yesterday, in a field on the farm of Bettyfield, midway between Kelso and St Boswells. Almost directly, the war was the reason for the demonstration, which took place under the auspices of the Newton St Boswells and District Farmers’ Club. In former years the Club has been in the habit of organising ploughing matches on a large scale, which have been highly popular, but this year an event of the kind was deemed impossible owing to the number of ploughs which are standing idle at the present time, owing either to the shortage of men or the shortage of horses. The call to arms has found a strong response among the agricultural community of the Border county, and the drain on the horse population has been even stronger, and has been more rapidly felt. There was also another shortage which the Club complained of, and which is also no doubt traceable to the present disjointed condition of things-the shortage of subscriptions. In all the circumstances, therefore, a demonstration of mechanical ploughing was a happy idea, and it attracted a large gathering of farmers and farm workers, mainly from the Border district, but also from as far as Stirlingshire and the extreme eastern portion of Berwickshire. One or two figures in khaki were among the crowd, and a recruiting sergeant, the requisite material being present, sought to “improve the shining hour.” Mr Logan, president of the Club; Mr Monteath, CA, the hon. Secretary; and Mr W. R. Murray, Charterhouse, the tenant of Bettyfield, were responsible for the successful organisation of the event. The field was of rather light land, under young grass, and was in every respect an ideal choice for such a trial. Only one unfavourable circumstance was encountered-namely, the weather, which was wet during the night and well on into the forenoon; but after midday it cleared up beautifully, warm sunshine prevailing and lighting with a picturesque touch the snow-clad peaks of the Cheviots, of which one had a prospect. Perhaps the more conservative of the spectators, regarding with hostility the entrance of the mechanical plough into a domain which had been so long sacred to the horse, did not look upon the weather as quite unfavourable, because it served to bring out weaknesses in both the mechanical implements on view, in a greater degree in the case of a large direct-traction steam plough, in a lesser degree in the case of a small, self-contained motor plough. On the soft going the mechanical productions were at a distinct disadvantage, mainly because of their weight, and at the end of the day it might fairly be said that the honours for all that counts in the mind of the ploughing expert – the debatable points of straightness of furrow, artistry of cresting, and neatness of finish – lay with the old-fashioned horse plough in the new forms in which it was shown in opposition to the mechanical production. That, however, was not surprising. The cardinal virtue of the mechanical plough is its capacity for work. Old ideas regarding ploughing neatness are changing, and the point which the mechanical plough raises is whether the more rapid pulverisation of the land and its preparation for sowing are as effective as the old method. That point can only be settled after an extended trial.
The economy of the motor
The economic aspect is naturally a first consideration, but it may be said that if results justify anticipations the future field of the motor plough is extensive. Up to this time the high cost of most of the productions has been a barrier, but in the case of the type on view yesterday (the Wyles) something practicable is at least foreshadowed. The “all in” cost is £140, and the working costs, exclusive of labour, but including an allowance for depreciation, is 3s to 3s 6d per acre. Except for the defect already mentioned, the failure of the driving wheels to grip properly on the soft surface, which was only noticeable during the first hour or so, the machine behaved very well. When in motion, and viewed from the front it presents the appearance of the forepart of a small motor chassis. The mechanical part is very compact, as indeed is the whole production, for it measures only 12ft 6in in length and 2ft 6in in width, with a maximum height of 4ft. Its weight is 18cwt. The designer has followed the lines of the horse plough very closely. The motor, with the driving wheels (fitted with detachable spikes and “spuds” for gripping on tough land), is at the front, and the plough is a natural continuation behind. It is a two-furrow arrangement, and the stated capacity on ordinary land is three acres per day. One acre per day is good average work for the ordinary two-horse plough. The man walks behind the motor plough in the usual way, guiding the direction, although the direction is easier kept with the new mode than with the old, as one or two stated who tried it. A seat for the ploughman, together with a special steering arrangement, is obtainable only on order; thus the “weary way” may be lighted. The motor (9hp) is first “cranked” or “wound” up in the ordinary way, and the clutches are controlled in a simple manner from the handles of the machine. Two-speed gears are fitted, the lower speed being practically the equivalent of the speed of the ordinary ploughing horse. The Wyles plough displaces four horses and one man, and the mechanical arrangements, regarding which some scepticism (based presumably on the motor engine of the past) was expressed, are such as may be easily mastered by the ordinary ploughman. The motor is stated to be also adaptable to other tillage operations, such as grubbing and harrowing, and can also be used as a stationary engine for driving chaff-cutters and other forms of farm machinery, but yesterday’s demonstration was confined to its ploughing capabilities.
Steam plough and ordinary ploughs
Less note may be taken of the steam plough, for the reason that it remained inactive for the greater part of the day. It was of the type fitted with the McLaren direct traction tackle-a four-ton traction engine, which hauled a four-furrow plough, with the moulds set in echelon fashion. Ordinarily eight furrows are undertaken, but the state of the ground was against its full operation. There was considerable doubt as to whether it would be possible to demonstrate it at all, and perhaps it would have been advisable, under the circumstances, had it not been tried, for the results were not successful, and were apt to give a false impression. The engine got over the ground quickly enough – with the eight furrows, two acres an hour is the ploughing speed claimed – but it was rough work, and the engine and plough proved cumbrous at the headlands, where the ground was softer. It may be noted, however, that the makers themselves do not recommend the direct traction system for soft, wet, or very hilly country, but prescribe for land which is dry and fairly level, and where the weather is not so variable – such a country as Hungry, on whose plains it has been a distinct success. Two men are required to work it, one for the engine and one for the plough, and in the case also the engine is adaptable for “general purpose work”, either traction or driving. The capital cost is £800, and the working expenses are about 2s 6d an acre, including the labour.
There were about a dozen horse ploughs also on demonstration. The original single-furrow plough was shown in its most renowned forms, but the greatest interest centred round the two types of double-furrow ploughs (Ransome and Oliver) which were shown. They were eminently successful, and won high praise. Three horses are necessary in each case, but this marks a saving of one horse and one man, as the one plough now does the work of two teams. They made a strong appeal to the farming community. Incidentally, mention might be made of the high quality of the ploughing, particularly of the three-horse implements, in which the spectators found much to admire and little to criticise. The demonstrations are being continued to-day if the weather is suitable.

















